8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 5 ) Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 100 ) The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination. 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 ) ) ) 5 ) Civic Center Courthouse 9:1-3.). ) ) 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. Department rules are available here. ) JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. 908.) ) ) You can always see your envelopes SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. 11 ) ) 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). 5 The motion was rejected by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December 30, 2022. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA "The application must state: The applicant's residence and office address; The courts to which the applicant has been . ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. 5 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) ) ) This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. ) ) Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 IVAN D DAVCHEV, ) Department: 403 ) ) The requirements for proposed orders, including the requirements for submitting proposed orders by electronic means, are stated in rule 3.1312. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) 12 REVIEW HEARING RE: PARENTING TIME, PR 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ), A. 5th 531, 557 & fn. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) ) Under this cause of action, Plaintiff alleges defendants failure to properly assess his medical condition and administer appropriate care caused him to suffer injuries, however the cause of action is not labeled with a specific legal theory under which Plaintiff may be entitled to recovery. 9 NICA DAWN DESTEFANO, ) Department: 404 ) 11 ) It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. ) The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) 11 ) Leach v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 906; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. ) 5 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. See Taylor, supra, 24 Cal.3d at 893 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant repeatedly drove under the influence, had convictions for drunk driving, and had previously caused accidents while intoxicated); see also Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant drove while intoxicated, speeding into a crowded intersection at 65 mph in a 35 mph zone, and attempted to mislead officers as to whether or not he was driving). 7:9-10.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM See, e.g. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. 5 Department 405 ) ) ) As with demurrers, the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice. (CCP 452.) ) ) See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. 5 See, e.g. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 See CCP 2030.290; see also Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 411; contra CCP 2030.300 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall include a meet and confer declaration and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 (contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke). There is no requirement that the failure to comply with discovery be willful for the court to impose monetary sanctions. ) ) ) 5 ) Time of Hearing. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 MARCUS C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA While Plaintiff alleges outrageous and prejudicial conduct, he fails to allege extreme conduct by SRMH, which is an essential element of the cause of action. 11 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) ) ) 5 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORTS AND REVIE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Attorneys offices are only located in California. 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. A memorandum that exceeds the page limits of these rules must be filed and considered in the same manner as a late-filed paper. Please visit the Court Technology for the software requirements needed to access online services. 8:8-9. 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. 11 ) 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Petitions for writs of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. 5 ) (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 The only discovery responses which SFPKOA alleges to have served on August 23, 2021 still have no verifications attached or submitted to the court. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. Filter by a specific county without spaces. ) 11 ) Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 You may also call or email the department. CCP 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280. ) 5 5 ) ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. ) However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 11 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 6 ALLEN SANCHEZ II, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779930 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. ) 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. 5 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 ) ) Fraud means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the intention on the part of the defendant of thereby depriving a person of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury. All pending and newly filed civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil Judges for all purposes. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A primary basis for Plaintiffs claims is that she was entitled to disability accommodations because her husband, Joe, was immune-compromised and of a group particularly vulnerable to Covid-19. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . 11 ) Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. 5 (CCP) 435. 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 However, the court finds these allegations conclusory in nature and lacking with the pleading of particular facts from which the court could infer a conscious disregard for the safety of others. This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ. CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. 5 When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. To the extent practicable, all supporting memorandums and declarations must be attached to the notice of motion. 5 ) Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit. Morales v. Sup.Ct. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. Dept. Code 452(d).) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Motions In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. Allen v. Sup.Ct. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 (2) If a California case is cited before the time it is published in the advance sheets of the Official Reports, the party must include the title, case number, date of decision, and, if from the Court of Appeal, district of the Court of Appeal in which the case was decided. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. Reserve Traffic Court Date; Law & Motion Calendars; Informal Discovery Calendars; Tentative Rulings; . It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. 11 ) A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) CCP 396b(a). SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). See, e.g. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff is evidently not claiming any further conditions and the information provided is sufficient on its face to provide Defendant with enough information regarding it. ) The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. ) The Court particularly noted that Ms. Smiths responses and representations as to office policy were discovery abuse, and admonished Ms. Smith on the record. (1) A judge may require that if any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules is cited, a copy of the authority must be lodged with the papers that cite the authority. 500, Attorneys may practice Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) ) Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 (CRC 3.1322.) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest. Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 239 [disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Sup. ) A petition for coordination and other required documents are submitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council at the following address: Chair, Judicial Council of California. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) apply to most motions. Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 511 Ex Parte Schedule:Monday through Thursday at 9:15 a.m. 9 MAURICE HUNTER, ) Department: 403 9 JONATHAN TRAWINSKI, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 13 TENTATIVE RULING This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Civil Code 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in noncontract cases where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. D. Fifth Cause of Action - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support his claim Defendant intentionally acted in an extreme or outrageous manner that resulted in the Plaintiffs emotional distress. (MP&A p. ) ) Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. will be able to access it on trellis. ) Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. Associate: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe: San Francisco County, California: Attorney: Law Offices of Harold E. Kahn: San Francisco County, California: Education . This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ) The information on this website is for general information purposes only. ) Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. ) 5 ) Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Department 404 PLEASE NOTE:In accordance with the Order of the Presiding Judge, a party or representative of a party may appear in Department 19 in person or remotely by Zoom, a web conferencing platform. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C. Civ. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 RODNEL MAGAT, ) Department: 403 Pro. ) This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 8H-8, Enforcing Demand: 8:1484, 8:1487; contra CCP 2031.310 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall set forth good cause for the demand and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) Hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) Sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. ) The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. CCP 396b(a), 397(a). ) ) 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 6 DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 11 ) ) All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. ) CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Plaintiffs counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) ) Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. Criminal records are not available online. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, ) Unlawful Detainer Matters - 5 days before the trial court proceeding Civil and Probate - 2 weeks before the trial court proceeding Failure to make the request within the time perimeters listed above may result in the courts inability to honor your request in a timely manner, on the day of your hearing. ) ) ) ) Civic Center Courthouse Court Clerk Print | E-mail The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. 5 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 The Hon. File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-20-354495 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) ) Cal. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) ) The Motion is GRANTED. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 WARREN W. PRINGLE III, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. ) 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). try clicking the minimize button instead. ) Quick Links ) 6 PATRICIA WHALEN CHERIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796788